Key Insights:
- The CFTC has regulatory proposals ready if Congress fails to complete digital asset market structure legislation.
- The CLARITY Act faces a September 15 Senate test requiring 60 votes to advance.
- Existing law limits how far the CFTC can regulate spot crypto markets without new congressional authority.
CFTC crypto rules could move forward even if Congress fails to pass landmark digital asset legislation, Chair Michael Selig said Thursday. The regulator has prepared proposals while lawmakers struggle to reach agreement on the CLARITY Act.
Selig told Bloomberg TV that establishing a market structure remains essential. He said legislation offers greater certainty, but existing authority gives regulators another path.
Selig prepares an alternative to legislation
Selig made the comments before the CFTC’s inaugural Innovation Advisory Committee meeting on August 20.
“Establishing market structure is critical,” Selig said. He added that regulators could pursue that objective through rulemaking or legislation.
https://twitter.com/WhaleInsider/status/2090414239995265479
The agency has not identified which proposals it has completed. It also has not provided a timetable for publishing them. Still, Selig’s position signals that congressional delays may not freeze the agency’s digital asset agenda.
The CFTC already regulates futures, options, and swaps involving digital assets. It can also pursue fraud and manipulation involving spot commodity transactions. However, its current powers do not provide routine supervision over most spot cryptocurrency exchanges.
That distinction places limits on CFTC crypto rules developed without congressional action. The regulator needs to be within powers established under existing commodities law.
Some of the rules on derivatives platforms, intermediaries, disclosures, and crypto futures may be separated.Broader supervision of spot digital commodity trading requires stronger statutory authority.
CLARITY Act approaches Senate test
Congress could provide that authority through the CLARITY Act.
The legislation would establish a federal digital asset framework and divide responsibilities between the CFTC and Securities and Exchange Commission.
The House approved its version in July 2025. The Senate Banking Committee advanced separate legislation in May 2026. But the process of negotiation goes on regarding decentralized finance and provisions for ethics and rewards for the stablecoin balances.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune has scheduled a cloture vote for September 15. The procedural motion requires 60 votes. Even a successful vote would not send the legislation directly to the president. It would allow senators to begin formal consideration and potentially amend the measure.
Any Senate changes could also require further negotiations with the House. Meanwhile, the approaching November midterm elections could narrow the available legislative calendar. That pressure increases the importance of the CFTC’s alternative regulatory route.
President Donald Trump urged lawmakers on August 19 to approve what he called a fair version of the legislation. Crypto executives from Coinbase, Gemini, Ripple, Kraken, Anchorage Digital, Grayscale, and OKX attended the White House event.
Existing powers leave a regulatory gap
The argument goes beyond whether the CFTC’s cryptocurrency regulations can proceed in the absence of legislation. How comprehensive those regulations could become is the bigger question.
The CFTC was established by Congress mainly to regulate the derivatives markets. It would need more supervisory capacity to increase its responsibilities.
Although the commission is supposed to have five members, Selig is the only confirmed commissioner at this time. Additionally, compared to fiscal 2025 levels, its workforce has decreased. Those constraints could become significant under an expanded mandate.
The CLARITY Act could require the agency to supervise digital commodity exchanges outside its current routine oversight. Staff would need to process registrations while monitoring new companies and trading activities. At the same time, the SEC continues developing its own digital asset framework.
Securitize President Brett Redfearn said the SEC recently withdrew a planned innovation exemption amid uncertainty surrounding the September vote. He expects the proposal could return afterward. That parallel activity shows why congressional clarity carries weight. Separate agency initiatives can establish rules within existing jurisdictions, but they cannot independently redraw statutory boundaries.
Innovation agenda stretches beyond cryptocurrency
Selig is also broadening the commission’s focus beyond digital assets.
The Innovation Advisory Committee’s August 20 meeting covers cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets. Discussions include customer protection, market integrity, and existing regulatory powers.
The committee can make recommendations, but it cannot issue binding regulations or expand the agency’s jurisdiction. Separately, the commission requested public feedback on August 19 about derivatives linked to artificial intelligence computing capacity.
The consultation examines liquidity, benchmark prices, manipulation risks, safeguards, and potential perpetual compute futures. Selig argued that growing artificial intelligence markets need effective tools for managing computing costs.
CME Group and Silicon Data are also developing futures linked to GPU rental prices. Proposed benchmarks cover Nvidia H100 and Blackwell B200 chips.
Those products remain subject to regulatory review. The expanding agenda means CFTC crypto rules will compete for agency resources alongside emerging markets and established derivatives oversight.
Conclusion
Compared to Congress, Selig’s stance sends a more direct message to the cryptocurrency sector. Even if lawmakers are still divided, some regulatory action can still be taken. However, rulemaking cannot fully replicate the powers of the CLARITY Act.
As a result, the vote on September 15 will test several pieces of legislation. It may determine whether Congress or regulators are in charge of overseeing digital assets.
CFTC crypto regulations could still progress in the absence of legislation. However, the legal authority already granted by Congress will continue to limit their reach.
